Michel Foucault and Laura Mulvey

Foucault makes the argument that we live in a society of “surveillance” This is to say that our society is based on amalgamation of “forces and bodies” all of which act to create an individual.

The Panopticon focused on the remaking of people and through self monitoring believing that one is being constantly watched. This worry shapes who the individual becomes in society. A society in which, due to the possibility of constant surveillance, individuals would start disciplining themselves.

Mulvey argues that visual pleasure is dominated by the male gaze and that female viewers learn to see through male’s eyes. Women are seen as objects of sexual desire. Men are associated with voyeurism, control and authority.

In my study voyeurism benefits the watcher whilst the watched is unaware of the intrusion. The watcher has the control, the power. The question is, are we the voyeurs or are we just curious about what we see?  When Gary Winogrand snapped a kissing couple in New York in 1969, he was echoing Robert Doisneau's famous shot of a "spontaneous" lovers' kiss in Paris in 1950. But there's an onlooker in the image as well, a girl staring at the camera as if to challenge its presumption; the woman being kissed is staring, too; everyone knows what's going on (whereas Doisneau's couple are professional models pretending not to know. Modern surveillance techniques looks like science fiction. But there's nothing new about the desire to watch someone without them knowing – and nothing unnatural about them being furious if they find out.



My own practice

The gulf between rich and poor has grown wider in the UK.  It paints a picture of a country shaped by equality and class difference, with the children of the poor destined to live much harder lives than those of the wealthy. My focus is that on our City streets these two types of people walk on the same pavements and breathe the same air. My aim as a photographer is to capture something about them as people, showing a contrast between the divide (the rich vs the poor). How do these two types of people present themselves? Our cities have a great divide between the very rich and the very poor. Do the rich look down on the poor? Is class difference evident to the passer by? Do people really care who they share a pavement with? City dwellers usually walk quickly and with their eyes fixed to the ground. What are they thinking? Where are they going? What is the hustle and bustle really about?

In my photographs I want to portray the way people identify with their environment, how they show their identity and social status in their actions, personality and surroundings. Is there no hope on the streets for our youths and are they becoming a threat or danger to others with anti-social behaviour. How do the rich and the less fortunate present themselves? These are all issues I am going to research and uncover through my photography.

I experienced a taste of this when I was photographing on the streets of Leeds. My subjects appeared quite hostile and defensive. I felt as though I was intruding, invading their space. There was a feeling of uncertainty between us. What was I doing taking their photographs? Was I capturing them in the way I wanted?

Format Festival Case Study

I have selected the above photographs as the subject matter relates to my interest in street photography. I find people and what exists  beneath the exterior fascinating. Loosing myself on a busy city street glimpsing at passers by and scanning how they could interest me as a photographer is compelling. Gary Winogrand creates black and white photography of street scenes. He documented the city and the urban landscape concentrating on it’s people and capturing animate with inanimate objects became a fascination. Winogrand’s unique view of the world is captured through his photography.

The second image focuses on the characters of the people and in the way they are interacting with one another. The male in his dominant role is seen holding the female and kissing her in the doorway. The female figure stares at the photographer with a look of awkwardness. She seems unaffected by the passion of the male. The girl standing on the pavement appears to be quite accepting of the kiss and possibly surprised when the shutter clicked.

Winogrand said “photography is not about the thing photographed. It is about how that thing looks photographed” This image looks intriguing. The figures do provoke thought. The surroundings do relate to the people. The whole composition comes together to create an image that will be remembered and discussed.

Globalisation

Simon Starling bases much of his ideas on efficiency. He once described his work as “the physical manifestation of a thought process” revealing hidden histories and relationships. He makes objects, installations, and pilgrim-like journeys which present him with an array of ideas. His interest is in transforming one object into another. He is more interested in the process that goes into the work of art than the end product.

For Tabemas Desert Run in 2004 the artist crossed a Spanish desert on an improvised electric bicycle. Water was the only waste product which was produced and he used that in a painting.

He is always mindful of the commercial exploitation of natural sources.

In 2005 he produced ‘Shedboatshed’ this was a dismantled shed made into a boat and filled with the sheds contents. The boat sailed down the Rhine and the shed was reassembled in a museum. Shedboatshed is seen as the artist’s comment on mass production and capitalism.

There are many meanings that we draw from his work. It is probably about Global economics, the balance of diplomacy between East and West. The message is clear that Asia’s economic power will overtake the money markets of Europe and we will all be powerless to stop it.

Simon Starling’s works have been exhibited world wide. His work is in the permanent collections of museums such as, Tate Modern, London, Guggenheim, New York, Museum of Modern Art Sydney. Alongside icons like Francis Bacon his exhibits have made a mark on the art world. His work weaves, eccentric, transformative stories from familiar objects, translating them, from one language, one state of being to another. There are transitions from modernism to mass production, collectable to disposable. Starling seizes upon everything and this makes his work exciting and magical.